Montanism


Montanism was, in part at least, an attempt to revive the enthusiastic

prophetic element in the early Christian life. In its first

manifestations, in Asia Minor, Montanism was wild and fanatical. It soon

spread to the West, and in doing so it became, as did other Oriental

religious movements (e.g., Gnosticism and Manichaeanism, see § 54), far

more sober. It even seemed to many serious persons to be nothing more than

a
praiseworthy attempt to revive or retain certain primitive Christian

conditions, both in respect to personal morals and ecclesiastical

organization and life. In this way it came to be patronized by not a few

(e.g., Tertullian) who, in other respects, deviated in few or no points

from the prevailing thought and practice of Christians. See also § 26.





Additional source material: Eusebius, Hist. Ec., V, 16-19, cf.

literature cited in McGiffert's notes. The sayings of Montanus,

Maximilla, and Priscilla are collected in Hilgenfeld,

Ketzergeschichte, 591 ff. See also Hippolytus, Refut., X,

25f. [= X, 21, ANF.]





(a) Eusebius, Hist. Ec., V, 16:7. (MSG, 20:463.)





For Eusebius, see § 3.





There is said to be a certain village named Ardabau, in Mysia, on the

borders of Phrygia. There, they say, when Gratus was proconsul of Asia, a

recent convert, Montanus by name--who, in his boundless desire for

leadership, gave the adversary opportunity against him--first became

inspired; and falling into a sort of frenzy and ecstasy raved and began to

babble and utter strange sounds, prophesying in a manner contrary to the

traditional and constant custom of the Church from the beginning. And he

stirred up, besides, two women [Maximilla and Priscilla], and filled them

with the false spirit, so that they talked frantically, at unseasonable

times, and in a strange manner, like the person already mentioned. And

the arrogant spirit taught them to revile the universal and entire Church

under heaven, because the spirit of false prophecy received from it

neither honor nor entrance into it; for the faithful in Asia met often and

in many places throughout Asia to consider this matter and to examine the

recent utterances, and they pronounced them profane and rejected the

heresy, and thus these persons were expelled from the Church and shut out

from the communion.





(b) Apollonius, in Eusebius, Hist. Ec., V, 18. (MSG, 20:475.)





Apollonius was possibly bishop of Ephesus. His work against the

Montanists, which appears to have been written about 197, was one

of the principal sources for Eusebius in his account of the

Montanists. Only fragments of his work have been preserved.





This is he who taught the dissolution of marriages; who laid down laws for

fasting; who named Pepuza and Tymion (which were small cities in Phrygia)

Jerusalem, desiring to gather people to them from everywhere; who

appointed collectors of money; who devised the receiving of gifts under

the name of offerings; who provided salaries for those who preached his

doctrine, so that by gluttony the teaching of his doctrine might prevail.





(c) Hippolytus, Refut., VIII, 19. (MSG, 16:3356.)





For Hippolytus, see § 19, c.





But there are others who are themselves in nature more heretical than the

Quartodecimans. These are Phrygians by birth and they have been deceived,

having been overcome by certain women called Priscilla and Maximilla; and

they hold these for prophetesses, saying that in them the Paraclete Spirit

dwelt; and they likewise glorify one Montanus before these women as a

prophet. So, having endless books of these people, they go astray, and

they neither judge their statements by reason nor pay attention to those

who are able to judge. But they behave without judgment in the faith they

place in them, saying they have learned something more through them than

from the law and the prophets and the Gospels. But they glorify these

women above the Apostles and every gift, so that some of them presume to

say that there was something more in them than in Christ. These confess

God the Father of the universe and creator of all things, like the Church,

and all that the Gospel witnesses concerning Christ, but invent new fasts

and feasts and meals of dry food and meals of radishes, saying that thus

they were taught by their women. And some of them agree with the heresy of

the Noetians and say that the Father is very Son, and that this One became

subject to birth and suffering and death.



More

;