The Apologetic Conception Of Chr


Christianity was regarded as a revealed philosophy by the apologists. This

they considered under three principal aspects: knowledge, or a revelation

of the divine nature; a new law, or a code of morals given by Christ; and

life, or future rewards for the observance of the new law that had been

given. The foundation of all was laid in the doctrine of the Logos (A),

which involved, as a consequence, some theory of the relation of the
br />
resulting distinctions in the divine nature to the primary conviction of

the unity of God, or some doctrine of the Trinity (B). As a result of

the new law given, moralism was inevitable, whereby a man by his efforts

earned everlasting life (C). The proof that Jesus was the incarnate

Logos was drawn from the fulfilment of Hebrew prophecy (D). It should be

remembered that the apologists influenced later theology by their actual

writings, and not by unexpressed and undeveloped opinions which they held

as a part of the common tradition and the Christianity of the Gentile

Church. Whatever they might have held in addition to their primary

contentions had little or no effect, however valuable it may be for modern

students, and the conviction that Christianity was essentially a revealed

philosophy became current, especially in the East, finding its most

powerful expression in the Alexandrian school. (V. infra, § 43.)





(A) The Logos Doctrine





As stated by the apologists, the Logos doctrine not only furnished a

valuable line of defence for Christianity (v. supra, § 20), but also

gave theologians a useful formula for stating the relation of the divine

element in Christ to God. That divine element was the Divine Word or

Reason (Logos). It is characteristic of the doctrine of the Logos as held

by the early apologists that, although they make the Word, or Logos,

personal and distinguish Him from God the Father, yet that Word does not

become personally distinguished from the source of His being until, and in

connection with, the creation of the world. Hence there arose the

distinction between the Logos endiathetos, or as yet within the being of

the Father, and the Logos prophorikos, or as proceeding forth and

becoming a distinct person. Here is, at any rate, a marked advance upon

the speculation of Philo, by whom the Logos is not regarded as distinctly

personal.





(a) Justin Martyr, Apol., I, 46. (MSG, 6:398.)





In addition to the following passage from Justin Martyr, see

above, § 20, for a longer statement to much the same effect.





We have been taught that Christ is the first-born of God, and we have

declared above that He is the Word of whom every race of men were

partakers; and those who lived reasonably are Christians even though they

have been thought atheists; as among the Greeks, Socrates and Heraclitus,

and men like them; and among the barbarians, Abraham and Ananias, Azarias,

and Missael [the "three holy children," companions of Daniel, see LXX,

Dan. 3:23 ff.], and Elias [i.e., Elijah], and many others whose

actions and names we now decline to recount because we know that it would

be tedious.





(b) Theophilus, Ad Autolycum, II, 10, 22. (MSG, 6:398.)





Theophilus was the sixth bishop of Antioch, from 169 until after

180. His apology, consisting of three books addressed to an

otherwise unknown Autolycus, has alone been preserved of his

works. Fragments attributed to him are of very doubtful

authenticity. The date of the third book must be subsequent to the

death of Marcus Aurelius, March 17, 180, which is mentioned. The

first and second books may be somewhat earlier. The distinction

made in the following between the Logos endiathetos and the

Logos prophorikos was subsequently dropped by theologians.





Ch. 10. God, then, having His own Logos internal [endiatheton] within

His own bowels, begat Him, emitting Him along with His own wisdom before

all things.



Ch. 22. What else is this voice but the Word of God, who is also His Son?

Not as the poets and writers of myths talk of the sons of the gods

begotten from intercourse with women, but as the Truth expounds, the Word

that always exists, residing within [endiatheton] the heart of God. For

before anything came into existence He had Him for His counsellor, being

His own mind and thought. But when God wished to make all that He had

determined on, He begat this Word proceeding forth [prophorikon], the

first-born of all creation, not being Himself emptied of the Word [i.e.,

being without reason], but having begotten Reason and always conversing

with His reason.





(B) The Doctrine of the Trinity





The doctrine of the Trinity followed naturally from the doctrine of the

Logos. The fuller discussion belongs to the Monarchian controversies. It

is considered here as a position resulting from the general position taken

by the apologists. (V. infra, § 40.)





(a) Theophilus, Ad Autolycum, II, 15. (MSG, 6:1078.)





The following passage is probably the earliest in which the word

Trinity, or Trias, is applied to the relation of Father, Son, and

Holy Ghost. It is usual in Greek theology to use the word Trias as

equivalent to the Latin term Trinity. Cf. Tertullian, Adv.

Praxean, 2, for first use of the term Trinity in Latin theology.





In like manner, also, the three days, which were before the luminaries(54)

are types of the Trinity (Trias) of God, and His Word, and His Wisdom.





(b) Athenagoras, Supplicatio, 10, 12. (MSG, 6:910, 914.)





Athenagoras, one of the ablest of the apologists, was, like Justin

Martyr and several others, a philosopher before he became a

Christian. His apology, known as Supplicatio, or Legatio pro

Christianis, is his most important work. Its date is probably

177, as it is addressed to the Emperors Marcus Aurelius and

Commodus.





Ch. 10. If it occurs to you to inquire what is meant by the Son, I will

briefly state that He is the first product of the Father, not as having

been brought into existence (for from the beginning God, who is the

eternal mind [Nous], had the Logos in Himself, being eternally

reasonable, but inasmuch as He came forth to be idea and

energizing power of all material things, which lay like a nature without

attributes, and an inactive earth, the grosser particles being mixed up

with the lighter. The prophetic Spirit also agrees with our statements:

"The Lord, it says, created me the beginning of His ways to His works."

The Holy Spirit himself, also, which operates in the prophets we say is an

effluence of God, flowing from Him and returning back again as a beam of

the sun.



Ch. 12. Are, then, those who consider life to be this, "Let us eat and

drink, for to-morrow we die" [cf. I Cor. 15:32], and who regard death as

a deep sleep and forgetfulness [cf. Hom., Iliad, XVI. 672], to be

regarded as living piously? But men who reckon the present life as of very

small worth indeed, and are led by this one thing along--that they know God

and with Him His Logos, what is the oneness of the Son with the Father,

what the communion of the Father with the Son, what is the Spirit, and

what is the unity of these and their distinction, the Spirit, the Son, and

the Father--and who know that the life for which we look is far better than

can be described in word, provided we arrive at it pure from all

wrong-doing, and who, moreover, carry our benevolence to such an extent

that we not only love our friends shall we, I say, when such we are and

when we thus live that we may escape condemnation, not be regarded as

living piously?





(C) Moralistic Christianity





The moralistic conception of Christianity, i.e., the view of

Christianity as primarily a moral code by the observance of which eternal

life was won, remained fixed in Christian thought along with the

philosophical conception of the faith as formulated by the apologists.

This moralism was the opposite pole to the conceptions of the Asia Minor

school, the Augustinian theology, and the whole mystical conception of

Christianity.





For additional source material, see above, § 16.





Theophilus, Ad Autolycum, II, 27. (MSG, 6:27.)





God made man free and with power over himself. That [death], man brought

upon himself through carelessness and disobedience, this [life], God

vouchsafes to him as a gift through His own love for man and pity when men

obey Him. For as man, disobeying, drew death upon himself, so, obeying the

will of God, he who desires is able to procure for himself everlasting

life. For God has given us a law and holy commandments; and every one who

keeps these can be saved, and obtaining the resurrection, can inherit

incorruption.





(D) Argument from Hebrew Prophecy





The appeal to the fulfilment of Hebrew prophecy was the main argument of

the apologists for the divine character of the mission of Christ. The

exegesis of the prophetic writings was in the spirit of the times. Hebrew

prophecy was also regarded as the source of all knowledge of God outside

of Israel. The theory that the Greeks and other nations borrowed was

employed to show the connection; in this the apologists followed Philo

Judaeus. No attempt was made either by them or by Clement of Alexandria to

remove the inconsistency of this theory of borrowing with the doctrine of

the Logos; see above, under "Logos Doctrine;" also § 20.





Justin Martyr, Apol., I, 30, 44. (MSG, 6:374, 394.)





Additional source material: Justin Martyr, Dial. c. Tryph.,

passim.





Ch. 30. But lest any one should say in opposition to us: What should

prevent that He whom we call Christ, being a man born of men, performed

what we call His mighty works by magical art, and by this appeared to be

the Son of God? We will offer proof, not trusting to mere assertions, but

being of necessity persuaded by those who prophesied of Him before these

things came to pass.



Ch. 44. Whatever both philosophers and poets have said concerning the

immortality of the soul, or punishments after death, or contemplation of

things heavenly, or doctrines of the like kind, they have received such

suggestions from the prophets as have enabled them to understand and

interpret these things. And hence there seem to be seeds of truth among

all men.



More

;