Later Montanism And The Conseque


In the West Montanism rapidly discarded the extravagant chiliasm of

Montanus and his immediate followers; it laid nearly all the stress upon

the continued work of the Holy Spirit in the Church and the need of a

stricter moral discipline among Christians. This rigoristic discipline or

morality was not acceptable to the bulk of Christians, and along with the

Montanists was driven out of the Church, except in the case of the clergy,
/>
to whom a stricter morality was regarded as applicable. In this way a

distinctive morality and mode of life came to be assigned to the clergy,

and the separation between clergy and laity, or ordo and plebs, which

was becoming established about the time of Tertullian, at least in the

West, was permanently fixed. (See § 42, d.)





Tertullian, De Exhortatione Castitatis, 7. (MSL, 2:971.)





As a Montanist, Tertullian rejected second marriage, and in this

treatise, addressed to a friend who had recently lost his wife, he

treated it as the foulest adultery. This work belongs to the later

years of Tertullian's life and incidentally reveals that a sharp

distinction between clergy and laity was becoming fixed in the

main body of the Church.





We should be foolish if we thought that what is unlawful for priests(63)

is lawful for laics. Are not even we laics priests? It is written: "He has

made us kings also, and priests to God and his Father." The authority of

the Church has made the difference between order [ordinem] and the laity

[plebem], and the honor has been sanctified by the bestowal of the

order. Therefore, where there has been no bestowal of ecclesiastical

order, you both offer and baptize and are a priest to yourself alone. But

where there are three, there is the Church, though they are laics.

Therefore, if, when there is necessity, you have the right of a priest in

yourself, you ought also to have the discipline of a priest where there is

necessity that you have the right of a priest. As a digamist,(64) do you

baptize? As a digamist, do you offer? How much more capital a crime it is

for a digamist laic to act as a priest, when the priest, if he turn

digamist, is deprived of the power of acting as a priest? God wills that

at all times we be so conditioned as to be fitted at all times and in all

places to undertake His sacraments. There is one God, one faith, one

discipline as well. So truly is this the case that unless the laics well

observe the rules which are to guide the choice of presbyters, how will

there be presbyters at all who are chosen from among the laics?



More

;