The Canon Or The Authoritative N


The Gnostics used in support of their doctrines writings which they

attributed to the Apostles, thus having a direct apostolic witness to

these doctrines. This they did in imitation of the Church's practice of

using apostolic writings for edification and instruction. Marcion drew up

a list of books which were alone to be regarded as authoritative among his

followers [v. supra, § 23, a]. The point to be made by the champions
br /> of the faith of the great body of Christians was that only those books

could be legitimately used in support of Christian doctrine which could

claim actual apostolic origin and had been used continuously in the

Church. As a fact, the books to which they appealed had been in use

generation after generation, but the Gnostic works were unknown until a

comparatively recent time and were too closely connected with only the

founders of a sect to deserve credence. It was a simple literary argument

and appeal to tangible evidence. The list of books regarded as

authoritative constituted the Canon of Scripture. The state of the Canon

in the second half of the second century, especially in the West, is shown

in the following extracts.





Additional source material: See Preuschen, Analecta, II,

Tuebingen, 1910; Tatian, Diatessaron, ANF, IX; The Gospel of Peter,

ibid.





(a) The Muratorian Fragment. Text, B. F. Westcott, A General Survey

of the History of the Canon of the New Testament, seventh ed., Cambridge,

1896. Appendix C; Kirch, n. 134; Preuschen, Analecta, II, 27. Cf.

Mirbt, n. 20.





The earliest list of canonical books of the New Testament was

found by L. A. Muratori in 1740 in a MS. of the eighth century. It

lacks beginning and end. It belongs to the middle or the second

half of the second century. It cannot with certainty be attributed

to any known person. The obscure Latin text is probably a

translation from the Greek. The fragment begins with what appears

to be an account of St. Mark's Gospel.





but at some he was present, and so he set them down.



The third book of the gospels, that according to Luke. Luke, the

physician, compiled it in his own name in order, when, after the ascension

of Christ, Paul had taken him to be with him like a student of law. Yet

neither did he see the Lord in the flesh; and he, too, as he was able to

ascertain events, so set them down. So he began his story from the birth

of John.



The fourth of the gospels is John's, one of the disciples. When exhorted

by his fellow-disciples and bishops, he said, "Fast with me this day for

three days; and what may be revealed to any of us, let us relate to one

another." The same night it was revealed to Andrew, one of the Apostles,

that John was to write all things in his own name, and they were all to

certify.



And therefore, though various elements are taught in the several books of

the gospels, yet it makes no difference to the faith of the believers,

since by one guiding Spirit all things are declared in all of them

concerning the nativity, the passion, the resurrection, the conversation

with His disciples, and His two comings, the first in lowliness and

contempt, which has come to pass, the second glorious with royal power,

which is to come.



What marvel, therefore, if John so firmly sets forth each statement in his

epistles, too, saying of himself: "What we have seen with our eyes and

heard with our ears and our hands have handled, these things we have

written to you"? For so he declares himself to be not an eye-witness and a

hearer only, but also a writer of all the marvels of the Lord in order.



The acts, however, of all the Apostles are written in one book. Luke puts

it shortly, "to the most excellent Theophilus," that the several things

were done in his own presence, as he also plainly shows by leaving out the

passion of Peter, and also the departure of Paul from the city [i.e.,

Rome] on his journey to Spain.



The epistles, however, of Paul make themselves plain to those who wish to

understand what epistles were sent by him, and from what place and for

what cause. He wrote at some length, first of all, to the Corinthians,

forbidding schisms and heresies; next to the Galatians, forbidding

circumcision; then to the Romans, impressing on them the plan of the

Scriptures, and also that Christ is the first principle of them,

concerning which severally it is necessary for us to discuss, since the

blessed Apostle Paul himself, following the order of his predecessor John,

writes only by name to seven churches in the following order: to the

Corinthians a first, to the Ephesians a second, to the Philippians a

third, to the Colossians a fourth, to the Galatians a fifth, to the

Thessalonians a sixth, to the Romans a seventh; and yet, although for the

sake of admonition there is a second to the Corinthians and to the

Thessalonians, but one Church is recognized as being spread over the

entire world. For John, too, in the Apocalypse, though he writes to seven

churches, yet speaks to all. Howbeit to Philemon one, to Titus one, and to

Timothy two were put in writing from personal inclination and attachment,

to be in honor, however, with the Catholic Church for the ordering of the

ecclesiastical mode of life. There is current, also, one to the

Laodiceans, another to the Alexandrians, [both] forged in Paul's name to

suit a heresy of Marcion, and several others, which cannot be received

into the Catholic Church; for it is not fitting that gall be mixed with

honey.



The Epistle of Jude, no doubt, and the couple bearing the name of John are

accepted in the Catholic [Church], and the Wisdom written by the friends

of Solomon in his honor. The Apocalypse, also, of John and of Peter only

we receive; which some of us will not have read in the Church. But the

Shepherd was written quite lately in our times by Hermas, while his

brother Pius, the bishop, was sitting in the chair of the church of the

city of Rome; and therefore it ought to be read, indeed, but it cannot to

the end of time be publicly read in the Church to the people, either among

the prophets, who are complete in number, or among the Apostles.



But of Valentinus, the Arsinoite, and his friends, we receive nothing at

all, who have also composed a long new book of Psalms, together with

Basilides and the Asiatic founder of the Montanists.





(b) Irenaeus, Adv. Haer., III, II:8. (MSG, 7:885.)





The following extract illustrates the allegorical method of

exegesis in use throughout the Church, and also the opinion of the

author that there were but four gospels, and could be no more than

four. It should be noted that the symbolism of the beasts is not

that which has become current in ecclesiastical art.





It is not possible that the gospels be either more or fewer than they are.

For since there are four regions of the world in which we live, and four

principal winds, and the Church is scattered over the whole earth, and the

pillar and ground of the Church is the Gospel and the Spirit of Life, it

is fitting that she should have four pillars, breathing forth immortality

on every side, and giving life to men. From this it is evident that the

Word, the Artificer of all, who sitteth upon the cherubim and who contains

all things and was manifested to men, has given us the Gospel under four

forms, but bound together by one Spirit. As also David says when he prayed

for His coming: "Thou that sittest between the cherubim, shine forth"

[cf. Psalm 80:1]. For the cherubim, also, were four-faced, and their

faces were images of the dispensation of the Son of God. For he says, "The

first living creature was like a lion" [cf. Ezek. 1:5 ff.],

symbolizing His effectual working, leadership, and royal power; the second

was like a calf, symbolizing His sacrificial and sacerdotal order; but

"the third had, as it were, the face of a man," evidently describing His

coming as a human being; "the fourth was like a flying eagle," pointing

out the gift of the Spirit hovering over the Church. And therefore the

gospels are in accord with these things, among which Christ is seated. For

that according to John relates His original, effectual, and glorious

generation from the Father, thus declaring, "In the beginning was the Word

and the Word was with God and the Word was God" [cf. John 1:1 ff.],

and further, "All things were made by Him and without Him was nothing

made." For this reason, also, is that Gospel full of confidence, for such

is His person. But that according to Luke, which takes up His priestly

character, commenced with Zacharias, the priest, who offers sacrifice to

God. For now was made ready the fatted calf, about to be immolated for the

recovery of the younger son [Luke 15:23]. Matthew, again, relates His

generation as a man, saying, "The book of the generation of Jesus Christ,

the son of David, the son of Abraham" [Matt. 1:1]; and "The birth of Jesus

Christ was on this wise" [Matt. 1:18]. This, then, is the gospel of His

humanity; for which reason the character of a humble and meek man is kept

up through the whole gospel. Mark, on the other hand, commences with

reference to the prophetical Spirit who comes down from on high to men,

saying, "The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, as it is written in

Isaiah the prophet," pointing to the winged aspect of the Gospel, and on

this account he makes a compendious and brief narrative, for such is the

prophetical character. And the Word of God himself had intercourse with

the patriarchs, before Moses, in accordance with His divinity and glory;

but for those under the Law He instituted a sacerdotal and liturgical

service. Afterward, having been made man for us, He sent the gift of the

heavenly Spirit over all the earth, to protect it with His wings. Such,

then, was the course followed by the Son of God, and such, also, were the

forms of the living creatures; and such as was the form of the living

creatures, such, also, was the character of the Gospel. For the living

creatures are quadriform, and the Gospel is quadriform, as is also the

course followed by our Lord. For this reason four principal covenants were

given mankind: one prior to the Deluge, under Adam; the second after the

Deluge, under Noah; the third was the giving of the law under Moses; the

fourth is that which renovates man and sums up all things in itself by

means of the Gospel, raising and bearing men upon its wings into the

heavenly kingdom.





(c) Tertullian, Adv. Marcion., IV, 5. (MSL, 2:395.)





Tertullian's work against Marcion belongs to the first decade of

the third century; see above, § 23, b. In the following passage

he combines the argument from the apostolic churches with the

authority of the apostolic witness. This is the special importance

of the reference to the connection of St. Mark's Gospel with St.

Peter, and is an application of the principle that the authority

of a book in the Church rested upon its apostolic origin.





If it is evidently true that what is earlier is more true, that what is

earlier is what is from the beginning, that what is from the beginning is

from the Apostles, it will be equally evidently true that what is handed

down from the Apostles is what has been a sacred deposit in the churches

of the Apostles. Let us see what milk the Corinthians drank from Paul; to

what rule the Galatians were brought for correction; what the Philippians,

the Thessalonians, the Ephesians, read; what the Romans near by also say,

to whom Peter and Paul bequeathed the Gospel even sealed with their own

blood. We have also John's nursling churches. For, although Marcion

rejects his Apocalypse, the order of bishops, when traced to their origin,

will rest on John as their author. Likewise the noble lineage of the other

churches is recognized. I say, therefore, that in them, and not only in

the apostolic churches, but in all those which are united with them in the

fellowship of the mystery [sacramenti], that Gospel of Luke, which we

are defending with all our might [cf. § 23], has stood its ground from

its very first publication; whereas Marcion's gospel is not known to most

people, and to none whatever is it known without being condemned. Of

course it has its churches, but they are its own; they are as late as they

are spurious. Should you want to know their origins, you will more easily

discover apostasy in it than apostolicity, with Marcion, forsooth, as

their founder or some one of Marcion's swarm. Even wasps make combs; so,

also, these Marcionites make churches. The same authority of the apostolic

churches will afford evidence to other gospels, also, which we possess

equally through their means and according to their usage--I mean the Gospel

of John and the Gospel of Matthew, but that which Mark published may be

affirmed to be Peter's, whose interpreter Mark was. For even the Digest of

Luke men usually ascribe to Paul. And it may well seem that the works

which disciples publish belong to their masters.



More

;