The Definitive Type Of Religion


The works of Dionysius the Areopagite first appear in the controversies in

the reign of Justinian, when they are quoted in the Conference with the

Severians, 531 or 533. There are citations from the works of the

Areopagite fifteen or twenty years earlier in the works of Severus, the

Monophysite patriarch of Antioch. In this is given the latest date to

which they may be assigned. They cannot be earlier than 476, because the
/> author is acquainted with the works of Proclus (411-485) and uses them;

also he refers to the practice of singing the Credo in divine service,

which was first introduced by the Monophysites at Antioch in 476. No

closer determination of the date is possible. The author is wholly

unknown.



That he was Dionysius the Areopagite (Acts 17:34) is maintained by no

scholar to-day. His standpoint is that of the later Eastern religious

feeling and practice, with its strong desire for mysteries and sacramental

system. But he brings to it Neo-Platonic thought to such a degree as to

color completely his presentation of Christian truth. The effect of the

book was only gradual, but eventually very great. In the East it gave

authority, which seemed to be that of the apostolic age, for its highly

developed system of mysteries, which had grown up in the Church. In the

West it served as a philosophical basis for scholastic mysticism. On

account of the connection between Dionysius and the later Greek philosophy

and the mediaeval philosophy, Dionysius the Areopagite occupies a place in

the histories of philosophy quite out of proportion to the intrinsic merit

of the writer.





Additional source material: English translations of Dionysius the

Areopagite, Dean Colet, ed. by J. H. Lupton, London, 1869, and J.

Parker, Oxford, 1897 (not complete); a new translation into German

appeared in the new edition of the Kempten Bibliothek der

Kirchenvaeter, 1912.





(a) Dionysius Areopagita, De Caelesti Hierarchia, III, 2. (MSG, 3:165.)





Dionysius thus defines "Hierarchy":





He who speaks of a hierarchy indicates thereby a holy order which in a

holy manner works the mysteries of illumination which is appropriate to

each one. The order of the hierarchy consists in this, that some are

purified and others purify; some are illuminated and others illuminate;

some are completed and others complete.





(b) De Caelesti Hierarchia, VI, 2. (MSG, 3:200.)





The heavenly hierarchy.





Theology has given to all heavenly existences new explanatory titles. Our

divine initiator divides these into three threefold ranks. The first is

that, as he says, which is ever about God, and which, as it is related

(Ezek. 1), is permanently and before all others immediately united to Him;

for the explanation of the Holy Scripture tells us that the most holy

throne and the many-eyed and many-winged ranks, which in Hebrew are called

cherubim and seraphim, stand before God in the closest proximity. This

threefold order, or rank, our great leader names the one, like, and only

truly first hierarchy, which is more godlike and stands more immediately

near the first effects of the illuminations of divinity than all others.

As the second hierarchy, he names that which is composed of authorities,

dominions, and powers, and as the third and last of the heavenly

hierarchies he names the order of angels, archangels, and principalities.





(c) De Ecclesiastica Hierarchia, I, 1. (MSG, 3:372.)





The nature of the ecclesiastical hierarchy.





That our hierarchy which is given by God, is God-inspired and divine, a

divinely acting knowledge, activity, and completion, we must show from the

supernal and most Holy Scriptures to those who through hierarchical

secrets and traditions have been initiated into the holy consecration.

Jesus, the most divine and most transcendent spirit, the principle and the

being and the most divine power of every hierarchy, holiness, and divine

operation, brings to the blessed beings superior to us a more bright and

at the same time more spiritual light and makes them as far as possible

like to His own light. And through our love which tends upward toward Him,

by the love of the beautiful which draws us up to Him, He brings together

into one our many heterogeneities; that He might perfect them so as to

become a uniform and divine life, condition, and activity, He gives us the

power of the divine priesthood. In consequence of this honor we arrive at

the holy activity of the priesthood, and so we ourselves come near to the

beings over us, that we, so far as we are able, approximate to their

abiding and unchangeable holy state and so look up to the blessed and

divine brilliancy of Jesus, gaze religiously on what is attainable by us

to see, and are illuminated by the knowledge of what is seen; and thus we

are initiated into the mystic science, and, initiating, we can become

light-like and divinely working, complete and completing.





(d) De Ecclesiastica Hierarchia, V, 3. (MSG, 3:504.)





The most holy consecration of initiation has as the godlike power or

activity the expiatory purification of the imperfect, as the second the

illuminating consecration of the purified, and as the last, which also

includes the other two, the perfecting of the consecrated in the knowledge

of the consecrations that belong to them.



5. The divine order of the hierarch(209) is the first under the

God-beholding orders; it is the highest and also the last, for in it every

other order of our hierarchy ends and is completed.(210) For we see that

every hierarchy ends in Jesus, and so each one ends in the God-filled

hierarchs.



6. The hierarchical order, which is filled full of the perfecting power,

performs especially the consecrations of the hierarchy, imparts by

revelation the knowledge of the sacred things, and teaches the conditions

and powers appropriate to them. The order of priests which leads to light

leads to the divine beholding of the sacred mysteries all those who have

been initiated by the divine order of the hierarchs and with that order

performs its proper sacred functions. In what it does it displays the

divine working through the most holy symbols [i.e., sacraments] and

makes those who approach beholders and participants in the most holy

mysteries, sending on to the hierarch those who desire the knowledge of

those sacred rites which are seen. The order of the liturges [or deacons]

is that which cleanses and separates the unlike before they come to the

sacred rites of the priests, purifies those who approach that it may

render them pure from all that is opposing and unworthy of beholding and

participating in the sacred mysteries.





(e) De Ecclesiastica Hierarchia, I, 3. (MSG, 3:373.)





The sacraments.





The mysteries or sacraments, according to Dionysius the

Areopagite, are six in number: baptism, the eucharist, anointing

or confirmation, the consecration of priests, the consecration of

monks,(211) and the consecration of the dead. These he discusses

in chs. 2-7 of the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy.





Salvation can in no other way come about than that the saved are deified.

The deification is the highest possible resemblance to God and union with

Him. The common aim of all the hierarchy is the love which hangs upon God

and things divine, which fills with a divine spirit and works in godlike

fashion; and before this is the complete and never retreating flight from

that which is opposed to it, the knowledge of being as being, the vision

and knowledge of the holy truth, the divinely inspired participation in

the homogeneous perfection of the One himself, so far as man can come to

that, the enjoyment of the holy contemplation, which spiritually nourishes

and deifies every one who strives for it.







Chapter II. The Transition To The Middle Ages. The Foundation Of The

Germanic National Churches





While the doctrinal system of the Church was being wrought out in the

disputes and councils of Rome and the East, the foundations of the

Germanic national churches were being laid in the West. In the British

Isles the faith was extended from Britain to Ireland and thence to

Scotland (§ 96). Among the inmates of the monasteries of these countries

were many monks who were moved to undertake missionary journeys to various

parts of Western Europe, and among them St. Columbanus. But even more

important for the future of Western Christendom was the conversion of the

Franks from paganism to Catholic Christianity. At a time when the other

Germanic rulers were still Arian, Clovis and the Franks became Catholics

and, as a consequence, the champions of the Catholic faith. The Franks

rapidly became the dominant power in the West, and soon other Germanic

races either were conquered or followed the example of the Franks and

became Catholics (§ 97). The State churches that thus arose were more

under the control of the local royal authority than the Catholic Church

had previously been, and the rulers were little disposed to favor outside

control of the ecclesiastical affairs of their kingdoms (§ 98). Toward the

end of the sixth century the greatest pontiff of the ancient Church,

Gregory the Great, more than recovered the prestige and influence which

had been lost under Vigilius. By his able administration he did much to

unite the West, to heal the schism resulting from the Fifth Council, and

to overcome the heresies which divided the Arians and the Catholics. At

the same time he advanced the authority of the see of Rome in the East as

well as in the West (§ 99). Of the many statesman-like undertakings of

Gregory none had more far-reaching consequences than the conversion of the

Anglo-Saxons and the establishment in England of a church which would be

in close and loyal dependence upon the Roman see, and in consequence of

that close connection would be the heir of the best traditions of culture

in the West (§ 100).



More

;