Effects Of The Persecution Upon


The persecution developed the popular opinion of the superior sanctity of

martyrdom. This was itself no new idea, having grown up in the Church from

the time of Ignatius of Antioch, but it now received new applications and

developments (a, b). See also § 42, d, and below for problems

arising from the place the martyrs attempted to take in the organization

of the Church and the administration of discipline. This claim of the
br /> martyrs was successfully overcome by the bishops, especially under

Cyprian's leadership and example. But in the administration of discipline

there were sure to arise difficulties and questions, e.g., Was there a

distinction to be made in favor of those who had escaped without actually

sacrificing? (c). No matter what policy was followed by the bishop,

there was the liability of the rise of a party in opposition to him. If he

was strict, a party advocating laxity appeared, as in the case of

Felicissimus at Carthage; if he was milder in policy, a party would call

for greater rigor, as in the case of Novatian at Rome (e).





Additional source material: Cyprian, Ep. 39-45, 51 (ANF, V);

Eusebius, Hist. Ec., VI, 43, 45.





(a) Origen, Exhortatio ad Martyrium, 30, 50. (MSG, 11:601, 636.)





An estimate of the importance and value of martyrdom.





The Exhortation to Martyrdom was addressed by Origen to his

friend and patron Ambrosius, and to Protoctetus, a presbyter of

Caesarea, who were in great danger during the persecution

undertaken by Maximinus Thrax (235-238). It was probably written

in the reign of that Emperor.





Ch. 30. We must remember that we have sinned and that it is impossible to

obtain forgiveness of sins without baptism, and that according to the

evangelical laws it is impossible to be baptized a second time with water

and the Spirit for the forgiveness of sins, and therefore the baptism of

martyrdom is given us. For thus it has been called, as may be clearly

gathered from the passage: "Can ye drink of the cup that I drink of, and

be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?" [Mark 10:38]. And

in another place it is said: "But I have a baptism to be baptized with;

and how am I straightened until it be accomplished!" [Luke 12:50]. For be

sure that just as the expiation of the cross was for the whole world, it

(the baptism of martyrdom) is for the cure of many who are thereby

cleansed. For as according to the law of Moses those placed near the altar

are seen to minister forgiveness of sins to others through the blood of

bulls and goats, so the souls of those who have suffered on account of the

testimony of Jesus are not in vain near that altar in heaven [cf. Rev.

6:9 ff.], but minister forgiveness of sins to those who pray. And at the

same time we know that just as the high priest, Jesus Christ, offered

himself as a sacrifice, so the priests, of whom He is the high priest,

offer themselves as sacrifices, and on account of this sacrifice they are

at the altar as in their proper place.



Ch. 50. Just as we have been redeemed with the precious blood of Christ,

who received the name that is above every name, so by the precious blood

of the martyrs will others be redeemed.





(b) Origen, Homil. ad Num., X, 2. (MSG, 12:658.)





Of Origen's homilies on the Pentateuch only a few fragments of the

Greek text remain. We have them, however, in a Latin translation

or paraphrase made by Rufinus. The twenty-eight homilies on

Numbers were written after A. D. 244.





Concerning the martyrs, the Apostle John writes in the Apocalypse that the

souls of those who have been slain for the name of the Lord Jesus are

present at the altar; but he who is present at the altar is shown to

perform the duties of priest. But the duty of a priest is to make

intercession for the sins of the people. Wherefore I fear, lest,

perchance, inasmuch as there are made no martyrs, and sacrifices of saints

are not offered for our sins, we will not receive remission of our sins.

And therefore I fear, lest our sins remaining in us, it may happen to us

what the Jews said of themselves, that not having an altar, nor a temple,

nor priesthood, and therefore not offering sacrifices, our sins remain in

us, and so no forgiveness is obtained. And therefore the devil, knowing

that remission of sins is obtained by the passion of martyrdom, is not

willing to raise public persecutions against us by the heathen.





(c) Cyprian, Epistula 55, 14 (=51). (MSL, 3:805.)





The opinion of the Church as to the libellatici. The date is 251

or 252.





Since there is much difference between those who have sacrificed, what a

want of mercy it is, and how bitter is the hardship, to associate those

who have received certificates with those who have sacrificed, when he who

has received the certificate may say, "I had previously read and had been

informed by the discourse of the bishop that we ought not to sacrifice to

idols, that the servant of God ought not to worship images; and therefore

that I might not do this which is not lawful, when the opportunity of

receiving a certificate was offered (and I would not have received it, if

the opportunity had not been offered) I either went or charged some one

other person going to the magistrate to say that I am a Christian, that I

am not allowed to sacrifice, that I cannot come to the devil's altars, and

that I will pay a price for this purpose, that I may not do what is not

lawful for me to do"! Now, however, even he who is stained by a

certificate, after he has learned from our admonitions that he ought not

to have done even this, and though his hand is pure, and no contact of

deadly food has polluted his lips, yet his conscience is nevertheless

polluted, weeps when he hears us, and laments, and is now admonished for

the things wherein he has sinned, and having been deceived, not so much by

guilt as by error, bears witness that for another time he is instructed

and prepared.





(d) Epistula pacis, Cyprian, Epistula 16. (MSL, 4:268.) Cf. Kirch,

n. 241.





This brief Letter of Peace is a specimen of the forms that were

being issued by the confessors, and which a party in the Church

regarded as mandatory upon the bishops. These Cyprian strenuously

and successfully resisted. See also Cyprian, Ep. 21, in ANF, V,

299.





All the confessors to Cyprian, pope,(70) greeting. Know that we all have

given peace to those concerning whom an account has been rendered you as

to what they have done since they committed their sin; and we wish to make

this rescript known through you to the other bishops. We desire you to

have peace with the holy martyrs. Lucianus has written this, there being

present of the clergy an exorcist and a lector.





(e) Cyprian, Epistula 43, 2, 3. (MSL, 4:342.)





The schism of Felicissimus was occasioned by the position taken by

Cyprian in regard to the admission of the lapsi in the Decian

persecution. But it was at the same time the outcome of an

opposition to Cyprian of longer standing, on account of jealousy,

as he had only recently become a Christian when he was made bishop

of Carthage.





Ch. 2. It has appeared whence came the faction of Felicissimus, on what

root and by what strength it stood. These men supplied in a former time

encouragements and exhortations to confessors, not to agree with their

bishop, not to maintain the ecclesiastical discipline faithfully and

quietly, according to the Lord's precepts, not to keep the glory of their

confession with an uncorrupt and unspotted mode of life. And lest it

should have been too little to have corrupted the minds of certain

confessors and to have wished to arm a portion of our broken fraternity

against God's priesthood, they have now applied themselves with their

envenomed deceitfulness to the ruin of the lapsed, to turn away from the

healing of their wound the sick and the wounded, and those who, by the

misfortune of their fall, are less fit and less able to take stronger

counsels; and having left off prayers and supplications, whereby with long

and continued satisfaction the Lord is to be appeased, they invite them by

the deceit of a fallacious peace to a fatal rashness.



Ch. 3. But I pray you, brethren, watch against the snares of the devil,

and being careful for your own salvation, guard diligently against this

deadly deceit. This is another persecution and another temptation. Those

five presbyters are none other than the five leaders who were lately

associated with the magistrates in an edict that they might overthrow our

faith, that they might turn away the feeble hearts of the brethren to

their deadly nets by the perversion of the truth. Now the same scheme, the

same overturning, is again brought about by the five presbyters, linked

with Felicissimus, to the destruction of salvation, that God should not be

besought, and that he who has denied Christ should not appeal for mercy to

the same Christ whom he has denied; that after the fault of the crime

repentance also should be taken away; and that satisfaction should not be

made through bishops and priests, but, the Lord's priests being forsaken,

a new tradition of sacrilegious appointment should arise contrary to the

evangelical discipline. And although it was once arranged as well by us as

by the confessors and the clergy of the city,(71) likewise by all the

bishops located either in our province or beyond the sea [i.e., Italy],

that there should be no innovations regarding the case of the lapsed

unless we all assembled in one place, and when our counsels had been

compared we should then decide upon some moderate sentence, tempered alike

with discipline and with mercy; against this, our counsel, they have

rebelled and all priestly authority has been destroyed by factious

conspiracies.





(f) Eusebius, Hist. Ec., VI, 43. (MSG, 20:616.)





The schism of Novatian at Rome was occasioned by the question of

discipline of the lapsed. While the schism of Felicissimus was in

favor of more lenient treatment of those who had fallen, the

schism of Novatian was in favor of greater strictness. The sect of

Novatians, named after the founder, Novatus or Novatianus, lasted

for more than two centuries.





Novatus [Novatianus], a presbyter at Rome, being lifted up with arrogance

against these persons, as if there was no longer for them a hope of

salvation, not even if they should do all things pertaining to a pure and

genuine conversion, became the leader of the heresy of those who in the

pride of their imagination style themselves Cathari.(72) Thereupon a very

large synod assembled at Rome, of bishops in number sixty, and a great

many more presbyters and deacons; and likewise the pastors of the

remaining provinces deliberated in their places by themselves concerning

what ought to be done. A decree, accordingly, was confirmed by all that

Novatus and those who joined with him, and those who adopted his

brother-hating and inhuman opinion, should be considered by the Church as

strangers; but that they should heal such of the brethren as had fallen

into misfortune, and should minister to them with the medicines of

repentance. There have come down to us epistles of Cornelius, bishop of

Rome, to Fabius, of the church at Antioch, which show what was done at the

synod at Rome, and what seemed best to all those in Italy and Africa and

the regions thereabout. Also other epistles, written in the Latin

language, of Cyprian and those with him in Africa, by which it is shown

that they agreed as to the necessity of succoring those who had been

tempted, and of cutting off from the Catholic Church the leader of the

heresy and all that joined him.



More

;