Marcion


Recently Marcion has been commonly treated apart from the Gnostics on

account of the large use he made of the Pauline writings. By some he has

even been regarded as a champion of Pauline ideas which had failed to hold

a place in Christian thought. This opinion of Marcion is being modified

under the influence of a larger knowledge of Gnosticism. At the bottom

Marcion's doctrine was thoroughly Gnostic, though he differed from the
>
vast majority of Gnostics in that his interest seems to have been

primarily ethical rather than speculative. His school maintained itself

for some centuries after undergoing some minor modifications. Marcion was

teaching at Rome, A. D. 140. The aspersions upon his moral character must

be taken with caution, as it had already become a common practice to

blacken the character of theological opponents, regardless of the truth, a

custom which has not yet wholly disappeared.





Additional source material: Justin Martyr, Apol., I. 26, 58;

Irenaeus, III. 12:12 ff. The most important source is

Tertullian's elaborate Adversus Marcionem, especially I, 1 f.,

29; III, 8. 11.





(a) Irenaeus, Adv. Haer., I, 27: 1-3. (MSG, 7:687.)





The system of Cerdo and Marcion.





Ch. 1. A certain Cerdo, who had taken his fundamental ideas from those who

were with Simon [i.e., Simon Magus], and who was in Rome in the time of

Hyginus, who held the ninth place from the Apostles in the episcopal

succession, taught that the God who was preached by the law and the

prophets is not the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. For the former is

known, but the latter is unknown; and the former is righteous, but the

other is good.



Ch. 2. And Marcion of Pontus succeeded him and developed a school,

blaspheming shamelessly Him who is proclaimed as God by the law and the

prophets; saying that He is maker of evils and a lover of wars, inconstant

in purpose and inconsistent with Himself. He said, however, that Jesus

came from the Father, who is above the God who made the world, into Judea

in the time of Pontius Pilate, the procurator of Tiberius Caesar, and was

manifested in the form of a man to those who were in Judea, destroying the

prophets and the law, and all the works of that God who made the world and

whom he also called Cosmocrator. In addition to this, he mutilated the

Gospel which is according to Luke, and removed all that refers to the

generation of the Lord, removing also many things from the teaching in the

Lord's discourses, in which the Lord is recorded as very plainly

confessing that the founder of this universe is His Father; and thus

Marcion persuaded his disciples that he himself is truer than the Apostles

who delivered the Gospel; delivering to them not the Gospel but a part of

the Gospel. But in the same manner he also mutilated the epistles of the

Apostle Paul, removing all that is plainly said by the Apostle concerning

that God who made the world, to the effect that He is the Father of our

Lord Jesus Christ, and all that the Apostle taught by quotation from the

prophetical writings which foretold the coming of the Lord.



Ch. 3. He taught that salvation would be only of the souls of those who

should receive his doctrine, and that it is impossible for the body to

partake of salvation, because it was taken from the earth.





(b) Tertullian, Adv. Marcion., I, 19; IV, 2, 3. (MSL, 2: 293. 393.)





Tertullian's great work against Marcion is his most important and

most carefully written polemical treatise. He revised it three

times. The first book of the present revision dates from A. D.

207; the other books cannot be dated except conjecturally. In

spite of the openly displayed hostile animus of the writer, it can

be used with confidence when controlled by reference to other

sources.





I, 19. Marcion's special and principal work is the separation of the law

and the Gospel; and his disciples will not be able to deny that in this

they have their best means by which they are initiated into, and confirmed

in, this heresy. For these are Marcion's antitheses--that is, contradictory

propositions; and they aim at putting the Gospel at variance with the law,

that from the diversity of the statements of the two documents they may

argue for a diversity of gods, also.



IV, 2. With Marcion the mystery of the Christian religion dates from the

discipleship of Luke. Since, however, it was under way previously, it must

have had its authentic materials by means of which it found its way down

to Luke; and by aid of the testimony which it bore Luke himself becomes

admissible.



IV, 3. Well, but because Marcion finds the Epistle to the Galatians by

Paul, who rebukes even Apostles for "not walking uprightly according to

the truth of the Gospel" [Gal. 2:14], as well as accuses certain false

apostles of being perverters of the Gospel of Christ, he attempts to

destroy the standing of those gospels which are published as genuine and

under the names of Apostles, or of apostolic men, to secure, forsooth, for

his own gospel the credit he takes away from them.





(c) Rhodon, in Eusebius, Hist. Ec., V, 13. (MSG, 20:459.)





At this time Rhodon, a native of Asia, who, as he himself states, had been

instructed at Rome by Tatian, with whom we have already become acquainted,

wrote excellent books, and published among the rest one against the heresy

of Marcion which, he says, was in his time divided into various sects; and

he describes those who occasioned the division and refutes carefully the

falsehood devised by each. But hear what he writes: "Therefore also they

have fallen into disagreement among themselves, and maintain inconsistent

opinions. For Apelles, one of their herd, priding himself on his manner of

life and his age, acknowledged one principle [i.e., source of

existence], but says that the prophecies were from an opposing spirit. And

he was persuaded of the truth of this by the responses of a demoniac

maiden named Philumene. But others hold to two principles, as does the

mariner Marcion himself, among these are Potitus and Basiliscus. These,

following the wolf of Pontus and, like him, unable to discover the

divisions of things, became reckless, and without any proof baldly

asserted two principles. Again, others of them drifted into worse error

and assumed not only two, but three, natures. Of these Syneros is the

leader and chief, as those say who defend his teaching."



More

;